Which statement best describes the Git workflow difference between GitHub Flow and Git Flow, and a key difference?

• A. GitHub Flow relies on a rigid branching model with develop and release branches.
• B. Git Flow focuses on continuous deployment with short-lived feature branches.
• C. GitHub Flow uses feature branches and pull requests into main for frequent releases; Git Flow uses a structured set of branches (develop, release, hotfix) for planned release cycles.
• D. GitHub Flow avoids code reviews.

Answer: (C)

The difference hinges on how the two workflows manage branches and releases. GitHub Flow centers on feature branches that are merged into the main branch through pull requests, with CI checks and reviews guiding each change. This keeps the main branch deployable at all times and supports frequent, incremental releases—an approach aligned with continuous deployment.

Git Flow, on the other hand, uses a more formal set of branches: develop for integration, a separate release branch to prepare a release, and hotfix branches to address urgent problems. This structure supports planned release cycles and more controlled release management, rather than constant, small deployments.

So the best description is that GitHub Flow uses feature branches and pull requests into main for frequent releases, while Git Flow uses a structured set of branches (develop, release, hotfix) to support planned release cycles. The key difference is the emphasis on continuous, rapid deployment versus planned, scheduled releases.